The purpose of this article is to openly discuss our most recent product and why we chose plastic over any other material. The bottle is 100% recyclable and uses 51% recycled plastic, but we have received many valid concerns from our amazing Hueligan community about our decision-making process and we feel that you deserve to understand exactly why we chose to use plastic in the packaging of our Ready-to-drink Huel.
Although there is a negative element to using plastic, there’s also a huge positive here about bringing more people on our journey to get more people eating less meat. If we can take two steps forwards but one step back, we are still going in the right direction.
Our mission is to make nutritionally complete, convenient, affordable food, with minimal impact on animals and the environment.
In industrial countries we consume 88kg of meat per person on average and this is set to rise further and further. The livestock sector generates more greenhouse gas emissions than the entire transport sector. It is also a major source of land and water degradation.
Roughly one third of the food produced in the world for human consumption every year – approximately 1.3 billion tonnes – gets lost or wasted.
Our Ready-to-drink (RTD) version of Huel is an instant nutritionally complete meal. Currently our main product is our Powder, where you add three scoops to water, shake and go. However, this process is alienating to many.
Currently we estimate that less than 1% of the UK have tried Huel.
Our RTD bridges this gap and opens up complete nutrition to a wider audience to benefit from. An audience that, by using Huel more, can reduce their impact on the environment further compared to consuming other, non-plant-based, non-dried food products.
There are many environmental considerations that have to be taken into account, and we work hard to consider all we can. This comes down to two main factors.
If we all do a little we can make a big difference.
Huel RTD can last for 3 months at ambient temperature. This will greatly reduce food waste when compared to the foods that many consume on a daily basis. By reducing food waste this is reducing the amount of fresh food that needs to be grown to fill the void of this food waste, thus reducing carbon emissions and water usage.
Plastic packaging is just one piece of the puzzle, and it’s important we take everything into account, not just plastic usage. By reducing carbon emissions, land usage, water usage, acidification and eutrophication, we could help tackle the problem of climate change. If we focus too much on plastic usage, and we don’t address energy efficiency or reducing our carbon footprint, then we will be in trouble.
What we’re trying to do at Huel is make plant-based options more accessible for everyone. If everyone had one plant-based meal a day, we could have a massive impact, and choosing Huel can help with that considerably.
To create an RTD, the packaging needed to hit a lot of criteria:
*Rancidity is where some fats oxidise when exposed to air, light or bacterial action and not only results in an undesirable change in flavour but can negatively impact cardiovascular health.
There was a huge variety of packaging options considered. We spent months making the decision and tried to work with well over 100 suppliers. Some of these options are listed below with their pros and cons:
Aluminium can
Cardboard bottle
Tetra Pak
Bioplastic
Recycled plastic
The bottle is plastic, yes. However, it is 100% recyclable, and despite the roadblocks in production, we have managed to make it with 51% recycled plastic too.
We have chosen this particular bottle as it allows us to give the product a longer shelf life, thus decreasing waste. Without using plastic, we would not be able to use aseptic processing, which is vital in ensuring that food is packaged into sterilised containers and reduces contact with unwanted bacteria.
We were extremely limited by what manufacturers could offer us. If a factory could technically produce Huel RTD, they then were not able to accommodate us on their factory line. We spent months speaking to over 100 suppliers, but there are very few factories that produce a product like Huel. Compromises had to be made by both sides so that we could start producing a product that ultimately has far less impact than the other foods people are eating for convenience. As we have already said, without using plastic, we would not be able to use aseptic processing, which is vital in ensuring that food is packaged into sterilised containers and reduces contact with unwanted bacteria. Factories would not allow this to happen as they insist on the use of aseptic processing for a product like Huel RTD.
Our product is aseptically filled to give it a long shelf life and therefore reduce food wastage. As mentioned above, there is only one factory in the world that could aseptically fill aluminium, but they do not have the equipment to produce Huel. There are a limited number of manufacturers even capable of making a product like Huel.
Tetra Pak isn’t widely recyclable; currently only 25% of Tetra Pak drinking cartons are recycled. As we pointed out earlier, a material is only as recyclable as the availability of places to recycle it. There’s no point putting a product in the recycling and hoping for the best.
There is not enough available. Our bottle uses 51% recycled plastic and we are striving to increase this. The Plastic Pact initiated by WRAP aims to have 30% recycled plastic by 2025.
In reality there isn’t enough available to provide a 100% recycled plastic bottle. There are a few reasons for this:
The majority of black plastic packaging is coloured using carbon black pigments which do not enable the pack to be sorted by the optical sorting systems being used widely in plastics recycling. However, this is generally in reference to the plastic used in food trays for ready meals. The lid to Huel RTD is made from PET and is fully recyclable.
There are a huge number of competitor products out there whose heart is not in the right place. If we had waited for cardboard or other packaging solutions to be invented or made usable by our factories, then we would have been even further behind in this competitive market – this project already took well over 2 years to complete. If we can release a product that is pretty damn good – super nutritious, highly convenient and affordable in packaging that is 100% recyclable and 51% recycled – then we can own the market share, be one of the biggest producers of a nutritionally complete RTD and then continue to strive for better as we always have. Our heart is in the right place. Others’ are not, but we pledge to strive to continue to work on this.
This is v1.0 and it’s already 100% recyclable and 51% recycled. Imagine what we can do with v2.0.
To put that in perspective, Innocent Drinks – a company many would say is very ethically minded – are 20 years old and use 50% recycled plastic and 15% bioplastic. Many other brands don’t do anything.
Environmental impact comes down to so, so much more than just packaging. Since Blue Planet earlier in 2018, the world has mobilised in the fight against plastic waste and the effect it has on the ocean in particular. Seeing the nation and governments and brands take such a strong stance on the environment is a huge win and needs to be celebrated. However, is it in detriment to the other factors of sustainability?
As pointed out earlier, it’s important we take everything into account, not just plastic usage: carbon emissions, land usage, water usage, acidification and eutrophication. It’s been regularly shown that eating a vegan diet is the “single biggest way” to reduce your environmental impact on earth. It’s also been shown that by removing meat products and dairy products, particularly beef, from your diet, you can reduce your carbon footprint by 75% and it would reduce global farmland usage by 75% if everyone did the same.
In fact, the impact of the lowest-impact animal products typically exceeds those of the highest-impact vegetable substitutes. For example, this means that using any plant milk, from any corner of the earth, is better than cow’s milk in terms of environmental impact.
As we highlighted earlier, at Huel we want everyone to have access to a range of plant-based options, and RTD is an important one of these. We could really help drive positive change if we all had one plant-based meal a day. With Huel, this is easier to achieve. There is no point focusing purely on plastic and neglecting carbon emissions from vehicles and wastage from spoiled food.
If we made changes to our RTD bottle or used another material to contain the product, the decision would be made purely because plastic usage is a popular topic now and so we could put a marketing spin on it. However, ultimately it would be made for the wrong reasons, and that isn’t what we do at Huel. We make considered choices.
Take our pouch, for instance. This is not currently recyclable, but we could make it recyclable and biodegradable tomorrow. However, we don’t because the total impact would be greater. Biodegradable pouches are weak and can’t currently hold 1.7kg of Huel. This means that more would break in transit and thus result in spoiled food and increased carbon emissions from transport to send a replacement if it reached a Hueligan in this condition. We could do a ‘recyclable’ pouch. The problem then is the infrastructure; yes, it could be ‘recycled’, but if not many places recycle it, then what’s the point? It’s an empty gesture which has marketing spin all over it.
We are not intending to stop selling our Huel Powder. Huel Powder is more nutritious and better for the environment as well as being more cost-effective per meal. We expect that when people are at home they will continue to use Huel Powder, but when they are on the go, an RTD is a better solution. RTD is a gateway to a new audience that would never consider adding powder to water, shaking and drinking but might consider drinking something off the shelf for breakfast or lunch.
Consider the alternatives for those people. A staggering 89% of people in the UK skip one meal a day and many rely on convenience food options. RTD needs to be compared against the things that people may choose in a rush or on the go. Think packaged sandwiches, crisps or a drink in a standard plastic bottle or coffee cup. Not only would RTD be considerably healthier than most of these options, it is likely to be better for the environment too. We estimate our current penetration in the UK market as less than 1%. An RTD will open this up to a wider range of people and thus increase the number of people using Powder too.
From the outside looking in, it could be easy to think that all our decisions were made with total disregard for the environment, that packaging wasn’t given a second’s consideration. As you can see from the above, this simply was not the case.
We will get better over time. v1.0 RTD is already 100% recyclable and 51% recycled plastic, but that doesn’t mean we’re done. We will continue to push forwards, particularly with the packaging of our product. Look at the first Apple computer that was released and the latest computer now – in terms of innovation there is no comparison. Our heart is in the right place, and we are strongly focused on our mission. So it’s better if we lead the category rather than a conglomerate creating their own.
To share with your friends, log in is required so that we can verify your identity and reward you for successful referrals.
Log in to your account If you don't have a store account, you can create one hereShare your #huel moments
Never miss out on new products, exclusive offers, and more when you join the Huel mailing list.